Families' Heartache Over Coastal Erosion Endangering Coastal Norfolk Burial Sites
Loved ones of people laid to rest in graves at risk from coastal erosion state that a lack of decision over how to tackle the problem is creating unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their departed family.
A Looming Danger to Ancient Churchyards
The council have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.
A newly published study on the situation details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to proceed.
“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”
Estimates indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.
Troubled by the Past
A local business owner remembered a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, including its church and graveyard.
“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing in search of valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”
“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”
A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy
Further up the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while serving overseas. His mother said she could not sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be moved.
“It does trouble me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”
She believes, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”
Seeking Answers and Clarity
The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.
Several families are calling for more coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to continue for now. Different voices argue the time for moving graves is approaching.
“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”
A local official confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that process with residents.”
It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the options. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”
“There is no common view on what should happen yet. It requires productive local conversations to discover the right answers for each community.”
The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in resurrection, providing a theological viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.